Food and Nutrition

If You Don’t Eat Meat, You Don’t Kill Animals, Right? Wrong, Says Argentinian Naturalist

Published by
Apollonas Kapsalis, M.Sc.

Among vegans and vegetarians, there are those who choose to do so simply because they prefer it – they do not like to eat meat. And that’s perfectly fine.

However, a lot more people who will say that they are on such a diet decided to stop eating meat for the love of animals, compassion, and in order to stop the killing.

This second group might be wrong and their reasoning is less logical. It may sound contradictory, to say the least, but not only that they participate in the killing of animals just like omnivores do, but they might also even harm animal life more than the meat-eaters.

At least, that’s what claims Claudio Bertonatti, one of the most famous Argentinian naturalists, people who have dedicated their lives to nature.

In his article The vegan misconceptions“, he warned the readers why by eating vegetables, you still support the killing of animals. This drew the anger of thousands of vegans and vegetarians but also their colleagues who deal with environmental protection.

However, if you listen to his arguments carefully, you must admit that they make some sense.

“I was an ardent vegetarian. As a teenager, I grew up in connection with and love for nature. I thought I could avoid killing many animals if I become a vegetarian. Later, I studied that topic a little better, I went into the wilderness and studied the local vegetable-animal world and then I changed my mind, ” explains Bertonatti in an interview for Playground.plus.

“I went to the country to study wildlife. I realized that in the fields of wheat, there are no birds, and those few that are found there are persecuted by farmers. As a vegetarian, I actually influenced the less killing of domestic animals, not the wild ones.”

“In Argentina, many think they are fighting for animals if they do not eat meat or wear leather clothes.”

“They think, if there were more vegetarians in the world, fewer animals will be killed. This is not true. From the moment humans began to cultivate cereals and work in the fields, it has already made an impact on nature and especially wildlife.

There are no animal species that are not connected to the system, the survival of some depends on death, whether directly or indirectly. I understand that this knowledge can be painful. I’d like to live in an ideal world,” he explains.

“When I say this, many feel under attack. Rice, corn, pastry … most vegetarians eat it. The first impact of such food production is the loss of forests. We are forcing nature to make room for crops. Many rainforests around the globe disappeared due to wheat and cornfields. And we continue destroying nature by preventing the birds to feed. Many farmers use poisons against these birds.

For other animals, they put electric fences or scare them away with guns. So, if you eat meat, you participate in killing animals. But if you eat vegetables, again, you participate in the killing of animals. But this time, you are helping in killing the wild animals,” says Bertonatti.

Should vegans abandon their diet because they can’t possibly cause zero animal deaths? From his PlayGround interview, it appears that renowned Argentine naturalist Claudio Bertonatti thinks they should.

Watch the video:

So what are your thoughts on this? Do Bertonatti’s statements make any sense to you? I personally think he needs to do some more research!

References:

  1. https://www.reddit.com/
  2. https://www.sciencealert.com/

View Comments

  • A lot of that food production and deforestation is specifically to feed the animals that will feed humans. Why not just eat the crops and let those animals live? Grow your own food Mkay?

    • sorry - i didnt meant to reply to your specific post, i meant to just comment in general - to clarify, i totally agree with your comment! it's spot on!

  • wrong......we grow tonnes more grain to feed the animals we eat so for those wild animals that may lose their habitat things would not change. less domestic animals would exist if we didn't breed them for food freeing up thousands of acres of land.

  • Exactly like Carol says, no one thinking you can live without hurting anyone we are trying to minimize the impact and there is no question it will work.

  • His argument is invalid. His reasoning is faulty. The amount of forest razed to grow enough grain to feed factory farmed animals is many times more than what is required to feed a vegan populace. Water, fossil fuels, pesticide runoff are also 4-8 times greater than would be expended for vegan needs. 8 times as many fossil fuels, 4 times as much water, etc. are required to produce animal protein.

Published by
Apollonas Kapsalis, M.Sc.